Marx's Work

Marx is also a advanced propagandist for his cause, primarily for the same reasons that he is a honest writer. A nice writer to some degree is a good propagandist. A writer without some cause is credibly not a good writer. A writer who presents two arrays of an line of products with equal dear and confidence will belike not do anything but confuse his readers.

A good propagandist, on the other hand, as Marx is, presents only one side of the issue, does so with passion and confidence, and leaves the reader no room for play from his one-sided accounts. The good propagandist, as Marx is, never bores the reader. Marx presents his portrait of account statement's class struggles and the saving era of socialism with enough solid-seeming argument to be convincing, but never lingers too massive, keeping sentences relatively soon and crisp.

The chronological order of his argument---taking each stage of capitalist increase step-by-step---allows the reader to follow the logic of that argument, again, whether or not it is original and accurate. He is finally a successful propagandist because he presents the argument in terms of good versus evil, the oppressed workers versus the tyrannical capitalists. The reader who is open to Marx's argument and follows it step-by-step cannot help but be affected to some degree by the author's passion and drive.

The result of this increasingly conflicted hunting lodge is that the worker is cut back to the level of a cog in a machine. All that matters is the bourgeois society is profit, money, rather than hu homosexuality. human beings relations argon reduced in importance as economic matters become paramount: "The middle class . . . has pitilessly divide asunder the motley feudal ties that bound man . . . and has left(a) remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest, than callous 'cash payment'" (82). What happens in this situation is that the workers themselves be reduced to the level of things to be sold, for they cannot live except by selling themselves as working machines.

The proletariat are reduced to "a class of laborers, who live only so long as they find work, and who find work only so long as their labor increases capital. These laborers, who must sell themselves piecemeal, are a commodity, like every other article of commerce. . . . " (87).

Marx bases his argument on what he says is a scientific analysis of history and its manifestation in the economic processes of society: "We see, therefore, how the modern bourgeoisie is itself the product of a long course of development, of a series of revolutions in the modes of production and of exchange" (81). Marx clearly uses history, then, to strengthen his argument by showing his analysis to be as scientific as any analysis of the material world.

The most raiseual facet of Marxian philosophy is its portrayal of the dehumanizing effect of capitalism. Capitalist markets must continue to expand, increasing focus on profits and production, and the effect is to turn the worker into an extension of the machine which makes those products. One must ask himself or herself, in this capitalist society, despite stock-still much money bulk might be making, how some(prenominal) people he or she knows who likes his or her job, and how many people he or she knows who does not feel like a dehumanized part of a machine.

The oppression of the p
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.