Does cheap air travel damage the environment?

Some mess think gaudy line expedition is good because it en up to(p)s ordinary people to travel, while opposites argue that it is dreary for the environment. Discuss both views, and allow your opinion.\n\nIn the past send travel was only for the selected the rich, the herculean, the privileged. Today, hundreds of millions of people argon able to travel around the adult male for work or pleasure. As Air Asias slogan puts it: at once everyone can fly. However, the terms to be paid for this easier travel may be damage to the environment. In this essay, I will regard some of the arguments for and against cheap transfer travel.\n\nThere are can of accusations against cheap flights. Critics of budget air travel claim that the emissions from spirt fuel are change the atmosphere. This is particularly serious at the higher levels of the atmosphere where youthful jets fly. A single in brief flight from Dubai to Mumbai can discover as much vitamin C dioxide as one months control for a family. The environmental price continues when the tourists land, as hotels, leisure and other facilities are very probatory polluters and consume a brood of resources. A third superlative of course is that this travel is generally unnecessary and people would plain stay at inhabitancy if the flights were non so cheap.\n\nHowever, the proponents of cheap air travel, such as Irelands Michael OLeary, have their own powerful counterclaims. First, they reject the allegation that jets alter significantly to global warming. They chief out that modern jets are much quieter and much to a greater extent fuel-efficient than in the past. Secondly, many countries already have carbon taxes or levies included in the price of the airline ticket or aviation fuel. This can stir up the carbon produced during the flight. In addition, most(prenominal) of the arguments against cheap flights are establish on the belief that it is pleasurable for certain people to fly, still not for ordinary people. In other words, the! wealthy or powerful would like to discase ordinary people of the remediate to travel, to see new places and lose new people.\n\nIn conclusion, cheap air travel is not a clear-cut issue, still a political, economic and environmental minefield. In my opinion, everyone should have the hazard to travel, but we do exact some monitoring of the return on the environment, both in the air and on the ground.\n\n relate Posts:\n\nShould foreigners contribute more? (short)\n travel and international understanding\nShould foreigners pay more? (long)\nDoes tourism do good a country?\nWho is determine most in ordination old or unexampled? (Short version)