Standard English, RP and the standardnon-standard relationship
Paul Kerswill division of Linguistics and English Language Lancaster University 1. Standard English and intercommunicate English as opposing norms: a demonstration The populations of the British Isles brook a varied, and often strained relationship with the phrase with which they have to engage every day in home run and in the spoken media. This is the language through which they are (almost) only educated, and which, many of them are persuaded, is both correct and, in an downright sense, good. Some are at ease with this language, others struggle to maitre d it. A few turn their backs on it. This bald impression of the multiple relationships between language users and Standard English is mean to highlight, not only the diversity of the sociolinguistic set-ups throughout the islands, nevertheless also the wide range of beliefs, opinions and responses relating to the notion of Standard English on the part of educators, policy makers and professional linguists, as wellhead as, of course, those millions who do not belong to any of these groups.
This chapter will address, first, how Standard English and Received Pronunciation (RP) have been conceptualised by those who have an academic, professional or policy-makers interest in them. Second, the chapter will deal with the nature of the variety space which is said to be bounded by Standard English and RP on angiotensin converting enzyme side and by non-standard, vernacular speech on the other. As we shall see later, the standardnon-standard dimension is closely related to the annotation between written and spoken language. But let us begin with an illustration of how norms involving standard/written English act with norms of spoken or non-standard usage. Sixteen adult non-linguistically...If you want to corroborate a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment