Courtroom Participants

Type of Participant Criminal tribunal Civil Court Remarks Judge Trier of law and sits as an impartial political party who will posit that the trial is conducted in an ly manner determine issues concerning admissibility of evidence determines issues of law and facts Although judges in both genteel and criminal begs discombobulate the same uses there is somewhat a little variation Civil court judge acts as the final authority whereas in a criminal court , the jury s renders its decision when requested .Jury Trier of facts Historically created with the confined to give the accused a fair trial by a jury of peers tasked with the responsibility of determining sin or innocence not solely based on facts or law alone The same with criminal court consumption In civil courts , a jury MAY not be requested or impaneled Attorneys Can either be defense or prosecution Prosecution attorneys represent the citizens of the assure or commonwealth and must as well as investigate and arraign individuals accused of a law-breaking Defense attorneys represent the interests of their clients . They also seek to reveal a reasonable doubt in the minds of the jury and judge in relation to the guilt of their clients sample to gather as much information as doable about the evidence to be presented in to gain strategic advantage over the other .

Witness /s present primary knowledge of the facts alleged for the jury to consider the same role as in criminal courts participate in depository and discoveryDefendant comes to the court accused of a crime presumed innocent until be guilty persons or corporations accused of untimelydoing or unhealthful behavior to the detriment of others In civil courts , a defendant must show a lack or absence seizure of responsibility in to avoid giving an award to the plaintiff However , the slightest hint of guilt or injury is fair to middling to sustain a finding against the defendant Plaintiff individuals who have suffered injury as a result of a crime individuals or corporations who have suffered some injury or wrong need whole to prove preponderance of evidence In criminal courts , plaintiffs must be able to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt in to obtain a favorable judgment In civil courts , plaintiffs need only prove preponderance of evidence in to prove guilt...If you compliments to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .