Marx and Durkheim's Theoretical Social Perspectives

Hard economic measure set out to be some group's fault. The battle lines shoot been drawn, and scoreers be sick and tired of their taxes supporting people who don't even wee-wee a right to be here in the archetypical place. These tax-paying workers would like to see the outlaweds deported as quickly as possible--massive roundups and interrogations would be implemented by local regime and those working in the public sector, like teachers and social workers. Public school students could exit authorities to their illegal parents, and entire families could be exposed at once. Teachers and police officers could be asked to interrogate all surmise illegals.

On the other hand, those against Proposition 187 make the claim that throwing children out of the schools, and removing their parents from a source of income, are not tenable solutions. Besides, after the identifications of illegals have been made, who is going to pay for the manpower essential to process the paperwork and take the families out of the U.S.? It may also be unconstitutional for authorities to use questioning of an "intrusive nature" to harass suspected illegals (McDonnell & Feldman, 1994, p. A-1). Those against Proposition 187 make the point that immigration reform fashion closing the border and sanctioning employers, rather than maintaining a "revolving opening" border and displacing workers subsisting on meager salaries.

When California's economy was booming, in th

e Reagan and early Bush years, illegal immigrants were an essential part of such prosperity. They contributed much of the labor indispensable so that the wealthy could live well-tended lives and gaze out upon well-groomed lawns. Now, however, they have become scapegoats for state economic losses that have secret code to do with them. Since the loss of jobs in the aerospace and defense industries, cutbacks in nonessential, nonproductive middle management positions, and the exodus of many companies who found much inviting business climates in Utah and Arizona, California has lead the population in unemployment figures.

Durkheim spoke of the essential solidarity characteristic of modern society, in which society is held together by the specialization of people and their imply for the services of many others. He claimed that a society with organic solidarity is characterized by restitutive law. As Ritzer (1992) writes, "Instead of being severely punished . . . individuals who [commit] minor offenses against the collective morality are likely . . . to be asked to comply with the law or repay--make restitution to--those who have been harmed by their actions" (p. 84).

The fact still remains that the proponents of Proposition 187, in an "us against them" mentality, want someone to pay for what they consider an infringement on their rights as taxpayers: illegal immigrants should get no public services. The bonds of humanity, or interconnections uniting all workers (legal and undocumented), have been strained. Undocumented workers are bestow their labor within a strained system that threatens to hand down if they do not fill the utmost take aim jobs, but they are not even considered worthy of work that no one else wants.

Durkheim would have seen the undocumented worker's contribution to the lowest level jobs in society as a necessary component in a widely diverse graze of social options. Durkheim was interested in what holds society together--people all have each
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.