The essay deals with Kant and how his view on rationailty determine's his view on morality, referring to his idea of duty

For Kant, the best way to live is the morally favourable way. This is non because of moral philosophys conferral to happiness, but because of the intrinsic value and signifi stinkerce of morality. The staple principles of morality argon principles of interoperable reason; and these basic principles of practical grounds argon a priori: our wisdom of these principles is not based on verifiable observation or experience. On the contrary, these principles ar in nigh sense built in to the composition of our intellectual capacities. Kant says that the legal impart is the fit of everything else that is inviolable. We can see that, at least in imperfectible rational beings like us, acting with a veracious provide means acting from the motive of vocation; and the totally things that we can will from the motive of duty be the things that duty requires us to will. So, if I am right to suggest that Kant believes that everything that is peachy is effective because it either is the good will or is the aim of the good will, then the only good things willed by us are things that are required by duty: acts of help others, respecting their rights, and so on.

Other things that we want, like fun and amusement, are not outright good at all, though they may be in immediately good if they help us to do things that are directly good. Kant actually says that the concept of good is unclear. There are things that are absolutely good verses those that are required by duty. On the other hand, there are things that are yet comparatively good, that is, good for something or other. Unless the end for which something is useful is itself good or required by duty, then the obje ct is barely good for something or other. ! If you want to get a intact essay, coif it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay