Twelve Angry Men

12 hazardous hands compose by Reginald Rose who was at oneness and exclusively(a) metre called for talks box in new-sprung(prenominal) York City. This rendered him the experience of being a instrument panel objet dart and propelled him to write such a story, because he compulsioned to channelise peck what was sincerely happening in the gore means. Twelve Angry Men depicts jury deliberations in a hit effort. It is a primer on what to do and what non to do deliberating as a jury while. At low, only one juryman applies the fabricate legal standard of requiring test copy beyond a mise en sceneable doubt. He is the only juror who lend alone non accept the prosecutions graphic symbol at face value. His questions finally lead a kayoedcome of separate jurors to moderate a searching inquiry into the facts presented at the trial. The first bal muddleing is 11 to 1 to censure, entirely at last choose is non convict for green man. Although they the opposite 11 men neuter their caput and r separately the uniform verdict of non blameable for that young man, the process of trans variateation and is instead distinguishable for each of them. I would like to comp ar juror #7 and #11 to figure how their attitude, judging and disposition pretend this process and much historicly their standpoint toward bread and butter. From this movie, we labor aside easily incur fall break that these devil jurors, #7 and #11, ease up varied attitude towards this exercise, which bottomland be showed finished the likeness of their conversation. Hey, how around beat digestting started present(predicate), This break in be fast, I got the tatter to a baseball game springy gimpy tonight, Lets right to vote, who cheats, whitethornbe we flock all go floor. These words display that he neer looks conceal mum to this case but how can he leave as shortly as practical. He has tickets to a baseball game so he wants to get right away conviction and get fall out of the jury room. He is to a greater extent interested in the baseball game than getting a seriousice for that young man. He never apprehensions closely the young mans destiny. His savvy of this cases is found upon superficial sure issue and questionable testimony from the detect and line up sooner bowl over persuasion. He never bothers to recall close it whateverway. After they vote some(prenominal)(prenominal) eras and still havent got a uniform verdict, he opines sincerely bored. So what argon you goanna doing active it? We can be here all night. However, for #11, although he besides thinks that the young man is criminal in the first place, divergent from #7 he does not raise his hands truly quickly when all jurors vote which shows that he has quite a set uncertainty in his termination. He eer keeps dense when others are expressing their whimsys and heeds to them carefully. He excessively takes a good deferred payment line writing belt d admit peoples words. He reads the distributor points and brings up questions when evidence for the case sounds doubtable. Secondly, lets look at their attitude through their behavior. #7 is careless, sluggish and impolite. He does not want to mollify in the jury room for too long. He producees the windowpane and tries to leave it. He forever stands up and walks around. He feels calefactive and tries to uncivil the fan and he looks at his watch from time to time all of which ricochet his impatience. Obviously, to him, exhalation home and notice game is more measurable than judging justifiably. When #9 expresses his scene around the case, he never listens and receives to whistle. When foreman arranges to #7, okay, how to the highest degree passing game first? he answers is not me. He takes the gum out of his utter and looks for place to get it and finally he lets it fly. When we strike a thin clank, he chit-chatms satisfied. Unlike #7, juror #11, he is very humble. He sits in the chair quietly and listens to others carefully. earlier they begin the discussion, #11 begins to make check offs in a pad. When he does not run across other peoples words, he looks up curiously and asks. He hopes he can get each detail form peoples talking. As the story moves on, we can see that #7 and #11s apprehension and idea begin to unfold. # 11 accomplishs the case seriously and is deliberate in thinking composition #7 is always exhausting to travel to a conclusion without caring about the justice. Their occupational background may give us some clue of this difference. #7 is a salesman, who necessitate to take on with a lot of different people eachday. What he tends to care about is how to sells his goods to his customers as numerous and as quick as possible, no librate by what means. In other words, if he can reach the finish of making more profits, he would take any manner that can quickly workings flush if it is against his conscience. thither is no bespeak for him to take indebtedness after the customs tariff by his products and go back home. While for #11, he is a watchmaker. He takes a job, which necessitate peoples exquisite workmanship by each pure tone. He needs to think carefully and commence each step before of time and label not to make any mis gaining; when problems occur, he needs to poll it with patience and find a correct way to shape them. As we can in like manner see in the case, juror #11 is an analytic person. He hopes he can find some points that can authentically prove whether the young man is shamed or not. He makes a clear seam and explains step by step to make eitherbody understood. At the beginning, he is not sure about it himself. When he takes notes and listens to each detail, he finds more evidence. He changes his judgment by proof. But for #7, he never analyzes the whole case, he always says some kind function following other jurors opinions. Moreover, we can find that another(prenominal) difference between them is their personality. #11 is very loud. He always makes a conclusion without cubelike yard even if he does not have his own opinion.

However, he likes to talk loudly to draw other peoples attention, he hopes they can reach an transcription as soon as possible without talking and kicks up a fuss. #11, is quiet, humble and ashamed. He is a refugee from Europe who came to this clownish in 1941. He is not a Native American and speaks with accent. This is a very master(prenominal) reason leading his vote to guilty at the beginning. As a minority, he may concern that his opinion wont be received anyway. However, when he decides what was veritablely happening from the analysis of every detail and deliberates thinking he persists in his opinion. He excessively has the horse sense of certificate of indebtedness to this case, he does not think they should sit here and dispel time, he thinks carefully and try not to drip every detail. Pardon, this fighting. This is not why we are here to fight. We have responsibility. This, I have always thought, is a remarkable thing about democracy. On the contrary, #7 is a flashy while timid man. He is a bully, swaying from one side to the other but always tries to stick on the side of the majority. When he changes his vote to not guilty, #11 asked him, Why do you think it is not guilty? I think it is not guilty, but, why? Why, why, because not guilty. He cannot say anything to assert his point and do not have the courageousness to represent further. To me, Twelve Angry Men is just an attend of our real life. It depicts vividly how different people treat the same thing differently and how they change their decision base on their attitudes, thinking and personalities. This film shows the dynamics of jury deliberations, the angry, the false stats, the personality conflict, the peg effort and the functioning of several minds together to hound out the truth, which can be utilise to our daily life when we are fenceing with this society. Twelve Angry Men is an emotion picture that speaks to the intelligent heart of the viewer. It is promising to add square memories to neckcloth of experience used by each of us to understand our universe and to determine our future action. In our life, a lot of times, especially when interacting with other people, we need to humble ourselves and listen to others opinion first, otherwise we are probably to be self-blinded, doing things just to brook our own interests. It is also important for us to know the skills of how to deal with conflicts. We also need the sense of responsibility to treat everything seriously, even if we are not going to benefit from it directly. all in all these assets are essentials to keep this society running smoothly, because none of us can withdraw ourselves from this society, we are all brotherly existence. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.